How to change the direction of the table in request for quotation?

satish_malkar · April 15, 2020, 9:52am

Hello Team,

In request for quotation i want to move the item table and supplier table …is this possible? right now the supplier table is in up side of the form so i want to move it down and item table move to up…anyone can help me how i do this …

neerajvkn · April 15, 2020, 8:53pm

use customize form and rearrange

satish_malkar · April 16, 2020, 3:11am

Standard filed can not be remove …not able to move standard filed

aakvatech · April 21, 2020, 1:26pm

You can’t move standard fields as per frappe framework. You have to do changes that will effect core ERPNext. This is a feature request you have to check in github of frappe.

aakvatech · April 21, 2020, 1:27pm

github.com/frappe/erpnext

Reorderable fields in Standard DocTypes

opened 12:17PM - 30 Jan 20 UTC

closed 01:21PM - 25 Feb 22 UTC

mariotruss

feature-request inactive

## Why it's important Every company works differently, therefore they need info…rmation in different representations or groups of information, without the loss functionality in built-in feature. Where Frappe might have combined 5 fields in 1 section, others might see 2 sections. This is very unique and depends on the company. Being a customizable ERP, I think offering the flexibility to change fields, will greatly improve adoption and implementation. Especially in the testing phase of a ERP-implementation. ## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Often times, we seek to implement a structure, workflow or data model in ERPNext and run into the issue of having the right fields, but in the "wrong" order. Wrong in this context means, that the [mental model](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_model) we are trying to integrate in ERP is different to what Frappe was thinking, when they created the DocType. We feel left with 3 option. None of them is ideal: **1. Accept the boundaries and use it.** Pros: - No extra effort. Cons: - This often clashes with the wishes or requirments for the software and can cause fustration. **2. Create a Custom DocType, that is mostly a copy of a standard DocType with a twist.** Pros: - All requirements can be fulfilled. Cons: - Extra work - Loss of default functionality - Redundancy **3. Hide irrelevant or misplaced fields.** Pros: - Standard DocType in use - All requirements can be fulfilled. Cons: - In Customize you see sometimes n-amount of fields that are hidden and causes information overload - You have redundant fields, because you have added custom field that is just replacing the hidden field - Unnecessary loading of elements that are not in use --> performance decrease **Describe the solution you'd like** - [ ] I can simply rearrange fields in a standard DocType - [ ] I can simply add custom fields in between standard DocType (a standard DocType)